<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7: Nothing more than Windows 6.1 in disguise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.techiebytes.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-nothing-more-than-windows-61-in-disguise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.techiebytes.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-nothing-more-than-windows-61-in-disguise/</link>
	<description>Technology information in byte sized chunks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Mahle</title>
		<link>http://blog.techiebytes.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-nothing-more-than-windows-61-in-disguise/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Mahle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cj52973.wordpress.com/?p=288#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MinWin and Windows 7:  There is only one problem with the theory being used.  &quot;Windows 7&quot; the marketing term as released by Microsoft specifically refers to the 6.1 Kernel line.  The name &quot;Windows 7&quot; is used only as such.  Microsoft has never released a new Kernel this late in the game - and the ramifications that releasing one this late in the stream would be catastrophic.  Developers, and vendors would be irate as hell - and the driver problems that plagued Vista&#039;s launch would be revisited with this launch.  It&#039;s just not going to happen.  And all recent chatter out of Microsoft pretty much confirms this.
 
I do, however, believe that the MinWin information does refer to the next full version of Windows... not the incremental change of the 6.1 version.  And, when Windows version 7 (code, not marketing name whatever that may be) is released it will contain much of what the current MinWin does.  The Marketed &quot;Windows 7&quot; however, for Microsoft&#039;s sake,  better not be it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MinWin and Windows 7:  There is only one problem with the theory being used.  &#8220;Windows 7&#8243; the marketing term as released by Microsoft specifically refers to the 6.1 Kernel line.  The name &#8220;Windows 7&#8243; is used only as such.  Microsoft has never released a new Kernel this late in the game &#8211; and the ramifications that releasing one this late in the stream would be catastrophic.  Developers, and vendors would be irate as hell &#8211; and the driver problems that plagued Vista&#8217;s launch would be revisited with this launch.  It&#8217;s just not going to happen.  And all recent chatter out of Microsoft pretty much confirms this.</p>
<p>I do, however, believe that the MinWin information does refer to the next full version of Windows&#8230; not the incremental change of the 6.1 version.  And, when Windows version 7 (code, not marketing name whatever that may be) is released it will contain much of what the current MinWin does.  The Marketed &#8220;Windows 7&#8243; however, for Microsoft&#8217;s sake,  better not be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://blog.techiebytes.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-nothing-more-than-windows-61-in-disguise/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cj52973.wordpress.com/?p=288#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MinWin has been hyped in different versions for years, it&#039;s not a new concept but it does have several variations.  If indeed the kernel hasn&#039;t been updated before the public beta then I doubt you&#039;re going to see it done. It would be disastrous for MS to make kernel replacement between beta and release.   Note your link is from 10.13.2007 they&#039;ve had plenty of time to implement the kernel. Regardless Windows 7 is not much more than a Service Pack to correct a poor marketing on an incomplete product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MinWin has been hyped in different versions for years, it&#8217;s not a new concept but it does have several variations.  If indeed the kernel hasn&#8217;t been updated before the public beta then I doubt you&#8217;re going to see it done. It would be disastrous for MS to make kernel replacement between beta and release.   Note your link is from 10.13.2007 they&#8217;ve had plenty of time to implement the kernel. Regardless Windows 7 is not much more than a Service Pack to correct a poor marketing on an incomplete product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biebs</title>
		<link>http://blog.techiebytes.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-nothing-more-than-windows-61-in-disguise/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biebs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cj52973.wordpress.com/?p=288#comment-44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good article, However you might want to do a lil research into minwin

http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071019/eric-talk-demo-windows-7-minwin/

MinWin is going to be the kernel overhaul for Windows 7 and once implemented, you will probably no longer see 6.1. I realize it may be a little confusing to some of you as to why Windows 7 doesn’t contain everything that will be Windows 7 but quite simply, as with many products, development and testing begins by integrating new code into the latest stable code. Until MinWin is implemented, you can basically consider Windows 7 to be an extension and evolution of Windows Vista SP1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article, However you might want to do a lil research into minwin</p>
<p><a href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071019/eric-talk-demo-windows-7-minwin/" rel="nofollow">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071019/eric-talk-demo-windows-7-minwin/</a></p>
<p>MinWin is going to be the kernel overhaul for Windows 7 and once implemented, you will probably no longer see 6.1. I realize it may be a little confusing to some of you as to why Windows 7 doesn’t contain everything that will be Windows 7 but quite simply, as with many products, development and testing begins by integrating new code into the latest stable code. Until MinWin is implemented, you can basically consider Windows 7 to be an extension and evolution of Windows Vista SP1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pochp</title>
		<link>http://blog.techiebytes.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-nothing-more-than-windows-61-in-disguise/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pochp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cj52973.wordpress.com/?p=288#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More and more Windows users are getting disgruntled I wonder if Windows is self-destructing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more Windows users are getting disgruntled I wonder if Windows is self-destructing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

